top | item 45210796 (no title) shdh | 5 months ago In police states there is stifling of free speechYour comment is largely hyperbolic and in bad faith discuss order hn newest fooker|5 months ago You mean, like deporting students for speaking out against Israel?Or is it free speech only for you? shdh|5 months ago INA guidelines are very specific with regards to supporting terrorist groups.Visa revocations are within the scope of USCIS/DHS authority.I’d say in some cases it is overreach, but I would not characterize it as a police state.If it was a police state you’d see citizens being silenced.
fooker|5 months ago You mean, like deporting students for speaking out against Israel?Or is it free speech only for you? shdh|5 months ago INA guidelines are very specific with regards to supporting terrorist groups.Visa revocations are within the scope of USCIS/DHS authority.I’d say in some cases it is overreach, but I would not characterize it as a police state.If it was a police state you’d see citizens being silenced.
shdh|5 months ago INA guidelines are very specific with regards to supporting terrorist groups.Visa revocations are within the scope of USCIS/DHS authority.I’d say in some cases it is overreach, but I would not characterize it as a police state.If it was a police state you’d see citizens being silenced.
fooker|5 months ago
Or is it free speech only for you?
shdh|5 months ago
Visa revocations are within the scope of USCIS/DHS authority.
I’d say in some cases it is overreach, but I would not characterize it as a police state.
If it was a police state you’d see citizens being silenced.