top | item 45211753 (no title) jlongr | 5 months ago You concede that monthly inflation is volatile but then proceed to assume it is has grown uniformly and speculate that it will continue to grow uniformly? Umm... discuss order hn newest UncleMeat|5 months ago The point is that the annual number is often rather confusing from a reporting perspective. m101|5 months ago And that an annual number is diluted and will only feed in slowly over time.If we knew inflation was permanently at 5% from now on, a blend with 2% for 11 months and 5% for 1 month, is not informative. load replies (1) jlongr|5 months ago They said: "12*0.4% is 4.8%. Inflation is running at an annualised 4.8%."This is patently wrong. load replies (1)
UncleMeat|5 months ago The point is that the annual number is often rather confusing from a reporting perspective. m101|5 months ago And that an annual number is diluted and will only feed in slowly over time.If we knew inflation was permanently at 5% from now on, a blend with 2% for 11 months and 5% for 1 month, is not informative. load replies (1) jlongr|5 months ago They said: "12*0.4% is 4.8%. Inflation is running at an annualised 4.8%."This is patently wrong. load replies (1)
m101|5 months ago And that an annual number is diluted and will only feed in slowly over time.If we knew inflation was permanently at 5% from now on, a blend with 2% for 11 months and 5% for 1 month, is not informative. load replies (1)
jlongr|5 months ago They said: "12*0.4% is 4.8%. Inflation is running at an annualised 4.8%."This is patently wrong. load replies (1)
UncleMeat|5 months ago
m101|5 months ago
If we knew inflation was permanently at 5% from now on, a blend with 2% for 11 months and 5% for 1 month, is not informative.
jlongr|5 months ago
This is patently wrong.