[Longlius]

Anonymity has no real impact on this. People post heinous things under their full legal names just as readily.

I'd argue if all it took was people saying some mean things anonymously to change your opinion, then your convictions weren't very strong to begin with.

[ks2048]

> People post heinous things under their full legal names just as readily.

I disagree with "just as readily" (i.e. most of the most heinous things are indeed bots or trolls).

Also, I imagine that without the huge amount of bots and anonymous trolls, the real-name-accounts would not post as they do now - both because their opinions are shaped by the bots AND because the bots give them the sense that many more people agree with them.

[numpad0]

IMO it's a bit of mental gymnastics to think that anonymity has to do with this, when extremist narratives always come attached with a memorable full name and a face.

[add-sub-mul-div]

You're right. It's the weakest who are the most susceptible to demagoguery.