top | item 45248922 (no title) evermike | 5 months ago As I mentioned in the article, this is extremely rare for us, but it has happened a couple of times. And that’s where I start having questions and frustration about the process itself.I’ve shared examples in the article. discuss order hn newest JumpCrisscross|5 months ago > this is extremely rare for us, but it has happened a couple of timesPut punitive terms into your SLA. (Though check with a lawyer about adhering to your merchant agreement.)Charging back doesn’t cancel a contract. If you want to be vindictive, you could sell the debt to a collector. singleshot_|5 months ago Restatement (Second) Contracts sec. 356 would seem directed squarely at this bad idea. load replies (2)
JumpCrisscross|5 months ago > this is extremely rare for us, but it has happened a couple of timesPut punitive terms into your SLA. (Though check with a lawyer about adhering to your merchant agreement.)Charging back doesn’t cancel a contract. If you want to be vindictive, you could sell the debt to a collector. singleshot_|5 months ago Restatement (Second) Contracts sec. 356 would seem directed squarely at this bad idea. load replies (2)
singleshot_|5 months ago Restatement (Second) Contracts sec. 356 would seem directed squarely at this bad idea. load replies (2)
JumpCrisscross|5 months ago
Put punitive terms into your SLA. (Though check with a lawyer about adhering to your merchant agreement.)
Charging back doesn’t cancel a contract. If you want to be vindictive, you could sell the debt to a collector.
singleshot_|5 months ago