(no title)
smegma2 | 5 months ago
https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/scf23.pdf (page 22, “Financial Assets” section)
smegma2 | 5 months ago
https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/scf23.pdf (page 22, “Financial Assets” section)
Terr_|5 months ago
For example, if one is using their life-insurance payouts to pay their rent... well, something has gone very wrong somewhere.
Specifically, this part:
> financial asset—which includes transaction accounts, certificates of deposit, savings bonds, other bonds, stocks, pooled investment funds, retirement accounts, cash value life insurance, and other managed assets
For the highly-liquid "transaction accounts" (checking, savings, money-market) the conditional [0] median is just $8k.
[0] AFAICT "conditional" here means "we don't include $0 data points in the median." That explains why the subcategory of "stocks" has a higher conditional median value than the more-general category of financial assets.
smegma2|5 months ago
infecto|5 months ago
The next exact line it calls out those bank accounts and the mean at $8,000. That is not a lot of liquid emergency savings for a household let’s say of 3.
So I don’t think your point stands.
smegma2|5 months ago