[whyandgrowth]

>Is the value of a portfolio decreasing?

Partially, yes. If your portfolio is 5 small web applications or Python scripts that AI can make in half an hour, their weight as a “demonstration of skills” drops.So, the fact that you can do it manually is no longer impressive.

What becomes important now: Architecture at scale — AI does not yet know all the nuances of large systems, distributed services, performance optimization, and security.

Business logic integration — understanding how the business actually works, where the pain points are, how users interact with the product.

Creativity and unique concepts — AI can create boilerplate, but it doesn't always understand that it is creating something fundamentally new.

Moral: AI takes away the “simple feats” but opens up new space for true engineering mavens. If you can do something that AI can’t easily replicate, your portfolio gets even cooler.

[justanotherunit]

I agree, that would also require engineers to become more invested into core domain problems, which would then lead to more specialised skills (deeper, not broader). My guess is that not everyone actually likes this, but as for now most of the current state points to that direction.

[barrenko]

> AI does not yet know all the nuances of large systems, distributed services, performance optimization, and security.

I'd say guess again. The chamber in the revolver of the russian roulette that is our careers just got infinitely larger, bets are off.

[humamf]

I wonder whats business integration covers in personal portofolios looks like. As far as I know I only seen articles and self contained project.