[whyandgrowth]

The strange thing is that such articles always evoke the idea that AI is replacing humans even in serious work, which is frightening.

[toss1]

The headline definitely evokes such an idea, but the detail in the article simply shows the machine learning system better augmenting the doctors' work

[siva7]

The strange thing is that this potentially life-saving tech will only collect dust because AI in medicine is only good for papers but not for real world usage. See all other AI medicine advancements. Same pattern. Medicine has a problem of not being willed to use modern tech to save lives.

[catigula]

I can understand reticence to basing conclusions about people's health on minimal evidence.

[hooverd]

Eh, this is about Luddite statistical models and not real AI (chatbots).

[deciduously]

Let's see how well it draws an SVG of a pelican on a bicycle