This is Luke Zimmermann from VOX Media, the parent company of The Verge and SB Nation. We've requested a formal review with Google after going to extreme steps to pull our advertising content to both do a thorough review and error on the side of caution that there wasn't anything malicious being inadvertently served up. At this time we're doing everything we can to get this on Google's radar and get it sorted out. We're continuing to monitor the situation as well and do everything in our power to make sure none of our readers and users are at any risk.
Definitely check for any unusual included content and then request a malware review. I emailed the malware team to make sure that this is on their radar.
More info is at http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&... and by doing a [site:google.com malware review] search, but it looks like you've requested the malware review correctly. In the mean time, I'd just double-check for any way that malware could have been included/downloaded on the pages.
Unless you routinely serve up javascript from domains like 'dustym' on port 8888, then you apparently haven't done anything yet - it's still being included on www.theverge.com right now.
FYI: SBNation is the main property of VOX Media that owns The Verge.
Something nasty must've gotten onto their CDN, but it wasn't necessarily from The Verge - since they operate a significant amount of websites - it's just that The Verge was using their parent company's resources.
Not really. I had a few websites that ran on Wordpress and got "infected" because of some vulnerabilities in a plugin. I had to manually remove the malware code - usually it's pretty easy to find - and go through Google website verification https://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en...
You can submit the site for review in google webmastertools but i think that is only for serps removal. Also AFAIK Chrome takes malware data from google's severs so webmsatertools seems to be the place to go.
I hope this doesn't set back the launch of Polygon. We've already been waiting for months, and according to Press Reset (their making-of documentary for the site), it's supposed to launch in October.
Why would you link me to that? There is no discussion there that is of any value above what's in this thread (there are no comments). Please don't do that; I realize it was only a couple seconds of my life wasted (plus the 30 seconds to write this comment), but I would really appreciate it if this didn't become a trend.
[+] [-] lukezim|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Matt_Cutts|13 years ago|reply
More info is at http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&... and by doing a [site:google.com malware review] search, but it looks like you've requested the malware review correctly. In the mean time, I'd just double-check for any way that malware could have been included/downloaded on the pages.
[+] [-] buro9|13 years ago|reply
If TheVerge can take it... just refer to the local addresses. Shove a Varnish instance in front to help if you fear for the web servers.
[+] [-] chrismeller|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] chewmieser|13 years ago|reply
Might just be because they're on sbnation, but there ya go.
[+] [-] nikcub|13 years ago|reply
Buying ads on large sites with lax controls is a very common and simple way to distribute trojans.
[+] [-] Dystopian|13 years ago|reply
Something nasty must've gotten onto their CDN, but it wasn't necessarily from The Verge - since they operate a significant amount of websites - it's just that The Verge was using their parent company's resources.
[+] [-] jnsaff2|13 years ago|reply
I would try setting a new hostname for the cdn content servers and see if that works. Assuming of course they have gotten rid of the malware.
[+] [-] MatthewPhillips|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] creativityhurts|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Ironlink|13 years ago|reply
http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnost...
Edit: Firefox provides these links in the form of a button labeled "Why was this page blocked?"
[+] [-] besttechie|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Achshar|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ChemicalScum|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] StavrosK|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] w1ntermute|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] thedz|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] denzil_correa|13 years ago|reply
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4528963
[+] [-] superchink|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mh-|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mopoke|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|13 years ago|reply
[deleted]