top | item 45309113 (no title) pitaj | 5 months ago They asked what was controversial about what he said, not whether the FCC's actions were constitutional. discuss order hn newest nobody9999|5 months ago >They asked what was controversial about what he said, not whether the FCC's actions were constitutional.The former is (for some at least) interesting. The latter is actually consequential. I'm concerned about the latter.The former, whether I agree or not, is about legal, protected political speech.
nobody9999|5 months ago >They asked what was controversial about what he said, not whether the FCC's actions were constitutional.The former is (for some at least) interesting. The latter is actually consequential. I'm concerned about the latter.The former, whether I agree or not, is about legal, protected political speech.
nobody9999|5 months ago
The former is (for some at least) interesting. The latter is actually consequential. I'm concerned about the latter.
The former, whether I agree or not, is about legal, protected political speech.