[vanc_cefepime]

Instead of making this Republican vs Democrat issue, how about you complete that paragraph.

"Suresh served in the Biden-Harris administration as Assistant Director for Science and Justice in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. In that capacity, he helped co-author the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights. He was named by Fast Company in 2023 to their AI20 list of thinkers shaping the world of generative AI."

Seems to me he wants rules and legislation around AI so it protects the American people. AI Bill of rights was deleted when this new administration took over but available at https://archive.is/XEFJJ

"To advance President Biden’s vision, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy has identified five principles that should guide the design, use, and deployment of automated systems to protect the American public in the age of artificial intelligence. The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights is a guide for a society that protects all people from these threats—and uses technologies in ways that reinforce our highest values"

[gyanchawdhary]

Yeah .. no . Firstly there’s really no such thing as “surveillance capitalism.” If we’re going to start coining terms like that, then why stop there .. lets call Oracle and Postgres “database capitalism or Microsoft vs Apple as “OS capitalism .. or Salesforce “CRM capitalism,” or even Google Docs as spreadsheet capitalism .. anyone who writes a an article with this sort of title is usually (actually almost always) a fraud

[jazzyjackson]

That's your opinion and that's fine but surveillance capitalism is not a freshly minted term - it simply supposes that the behavioral data collected on all of us is a new form of capital to be accumulated, exploited, and hoarded