top | item 45324144

(no title)

drankl | 5 months ago

To quote the British Prime Minister, the purpose of recognising a Palestinian state comprising both Gaza and the West Bank is to "revive the hope of peace and a two-state solution".

But how can that work in practice when the stated aim of Hamas is to eradicate Israel? It seems that removal of Hamas from power in Gaza would be a prerequisite.

discuss

order

AlecSchueler|5 months ago

Hamas isn't Palestine. Hamas is a response to the lack of recognition. Treat the people like humans and the support for violence rapidly decreases.

You see this everywhere again and again. The stated purpose of the IRA was to end British rule in Ireland and bring about a unified Irish Republic. How was it possible for that conflict to end without reunification, why did the support for the violence dissipate? Giving people equal status and the means to better their material position. But as long as the British would have kept the army on the ground shooting protestors? They wouldn't even sit at the table.

apexalpha|5 months ago

The Israeli political left agrees with you and as such retreated from Gaza in 2006 to allow Gazans self determination.

They voted in Hamas and started a 19 year long terror campaign against both their neighbours.

Any pointers to prevent such a thing happening but 10x bigger when all of Palestine get self determination?

password54321|5 months ago

You are using the name Hamas as a proxy for Palestinian. Everyone can see what you are doing.

SilverElfin|5 months ago

It’s a good proxy since the residents of Gaza voted for them and polls - even after October 7 - show they still support them. This is despite their abhorrent fundamentalist genocidal charter and more than a decade of sustained rocket attacks against Israel.

drankl|5 months ago

I am not.