top | item 45328450 (no title) deagle50 | 5 months ago parent said free, not open source. I want Mojo to succeed, but I'm also doubtful of the business model. discuss order hn newest GeekyBear|5 months ago Do you get a functional version of CUDA free with AMD's much more reasonably priced hardware?Mojo is planned to be both free and open source by the end of next year and it's not vendor locked to extremely expensive hardware. pjmlp|5 months ago To take full advantage of Mojo you will need Modular's ecosystem, and they need to pay the VCs back somehow.Also as of today anything CUDA works out of the box in Windows, Mojo might eventually work outside WSL, some day. load replies (1)
GeekyBear|5 months ago Do you get a functional version of CUDA free with AMD's much more reasonably priced hardware?Mojo is planned to be both free and open source by the end of next year and it's not vendor locked to extremely expensive hardware. pjmlp|5 months ago To take full advantage of Mojo you will need Modular's ecosystem, and they need to pay the VCs back somehow.Also as of today anything CUDA works out of the box in Windows, Mojo might eventually work outside WSL, some day. load replies (1)
pjmlp|5 months ago To take full advantage of Mojo you will need Modular's ecosystem, and they need to pay the VCs back somehow.Also as of today anything CUDA works out of the box in Windows, Mojo might eventually work outside WSL, some day. load replies (1)
GeekyBear|5 months ago
Mojo is planned to be both free and open source by the end of next year and it's not vendor locked to extremely expensive hardware.
pjmlp|5 months ago
Also as of today anything CUDA works out of the box in Windows, Mojo might eventually work outside WSL, some day.