An interesting article, sure, but there's a small problem. The section of Istanbul that they've chosen (centered here: https://maps.google.com/?ll=41.044081,29.096603&spn=0.04...) is actually on the Anatolian side of the Bosphorus, and it's one of the newer neighborhoods. The streets are actually arranged like that because of the terrain, more than because of history.
That said, this is a case of being right for the wrong reason. Istanbul is an amazing city to walk through. It's like the worlds largest living maze, and you're never quite sure where you'll pop out.
For example, the first time I was there, we turned a corner down an alley to try and get to one of the main roads. The alley started out wide enough for us to walk three-abreast, but quickly narrowed. At some point I looked up and noticed that there was now a roof over our heads. Eventually the alley narrowed to where we had to turn sideways to squeeze past people coming in the opposite direction, and there were shop counters on either side. A few feet more, and we stepped out onto the main street we had been looking for. I turned around, but where I expected to see the alley was, instead, what looked like a regular store-front, identical to all those next to it on either side...
But you don't have to believe me. Yandex has great walking maps of Istanbul! Here's the location I was just describing: http://harita.yandex.com.tr/-/CVeLjW60
I think there is more to it than the terrain and history. Turkish culture has an inclination towards irregularity. You have to constantly improvise or think, when making a decision, there are no well set out rules of living. This reflects to every part of life including the cities. The upside is that Turkish people are alert while walking on the street or any time of their life, which creates an active culture. The downsides are many, e.g. bad things happen in case of an accident or catastrophe.
Istanbul indeed is an amazing city to walk through, but I think it's more so for tourists who find it exotic. Having lived here for more than a year now I find the streets here quite frustrating - because of the irregularity, extreme density and especially because of the ascents/hills. I am talking purely from the perspective of getting from point A to B in a daily life. I commute to work by walking, takes only 15 minutes; but I go down and up a very steep ascent so I have to sweat twice a day :) Not to mention the cars which gets past quite fast just an inch away from me while I myself am just inch away from the edge of the road.
I still love this city with all its beauty and uniqueness. What I like most is that there are endless amount places to go, see a and discover.
But when it comes city-structure, it's the roads that I miss most about US and Kazakhstan where there is a concept of a "sidewalk" and "road" (an actual, real road) - I think you know what I mean by this :)
Came here to point this out, too. Would be interesting if they redo the analysis on the old part of town. Where was teh alley that you are referring to? Near the Grand Bazaar (Kapali Carsi)?
I've been transfixed with the idea of 'Digital Comparative Studies of Cities' (or some similar turn of phrase).
With the advent of mapping projects (GoogleMaps, Openstreetmap, etc), environmental sensor networks (my startup's area), and cheaper LiDAR arrays (for point cloud mappings of buildings and terrain...now in CMOS form) - we'll be able to quantify the homogeny of surbanization, architectural 'themes', road uniformity, development rates, etc over time.
There are lots of similarly clever projects cited on BLDGBlog [1] if you're into this kind of thing.
all those crooked, lopsided, curvaceous streets, going off in so many directions, I can't help wondering, what would it be like to wander there?
It would be like the suburbs in the US. Houses are all on cul-de-sacs that wind around and eventually join larger streets which eventually join arterial streets. Pretty much like the map of Istanbul they chose.
Cul-de-sac suburban developments rarely connect to neighboring developments. They don't even always connect to all of the larger streets that they border.
This lack of connectivity between them is the primary criticism. The map of Istanbul suggests that you might wander into a dead-end alley or cul-de-sac, but one does not enter what amounts to a neighborhood full of dead-ends, the only exit from which is the way you came in. It certainly doesn't suggest that any notable fraction of city is subdivided that way.
I don't buy it at all. One of the things I love about Italy is that the level of diversity and odd details in the architecture is amazing, and "fractal" in the more pop-science sense of being able to look at things closer and closer and find new and interesting things to see.
I find US burbs incredibly boring in their sameness, although they do have other advantages.
I used to live in Istanbul, I actually lived in the section shown on this map. I can verify from walking hundreds of miles through those serpentine back roads that wandering Istanbul is a beautiful experience.
Allan Jacobs' book Great Streets contains dozens of this type of map, not chopped up, but showing the street systems all at the same scale. It's absolutely fascinating to compare 'Cisco to Houston to Paris to Venice. A highly recommended book. http://www.amazon.com/Great-Streets-Allan-B-Jacobs/dp/026260...
Humorous post. I can't say that I am surprised by Paris dissected. All those small streets and alleys creates a lot of small segments and those small segments, when looked from above, will seem monotonous and all in the same shape. It seems that it is mostly the larger segments that are oddly shaped and that is not really surprising.
Something that also doesn't carry over this interesting approach is the land area. Paris is only 105.4 km2, New York City is roughly 7 times as large, Berlin 9 times and you could fit 50 Paris inside Istanbul as a whole. Those tiny segments are really, really tiny - they don't have the time to be oddly shaped over just a few dozen meters ;)
There seems to be a value judgement here: that curvy and uniquely shaped streets are superior in some way. This can be decided with objective evidence: look at how city districts flourish, and see whether it is related to the shape of the city blocks.
Paris looks more homogeneous than it is simply because they analyzed a bigger area, or at least an area with more pieces. For example if you analyzed the entirety of Istanbul, then for almost every piece you could probably find a very similar piece elsewhere.
In the cities (where this is true), that is a good thing. City streets are about efficiency of transport. A road that seems to go straight to your destination but then ends abruptly is not a good thing. Freeways are boring for the same reason. They're not meant to be exciting, they're meant to be roads.
Country roads in America are anything but boring, though. Some of them are bordering on downright dangerous with the twists, turns, and hills. I've never heard anyone argue that city streets were too efficient.
Love this project!
I'm curious to find out how Indian cities would hold up to this exercise. A city like Delhi that is made up of 7+ old and new cities, Mumbai which is sea front and hard pressed for real estate (which important city isn't?!) and Bangalore which has very old green parts and very new barren areas would all be fun to map.
One other interesting exercise would be to map the cities over time. A satellite view image from the 1960's and one from 2012. Could throw up interesting anthropomorphical results.
He never says what "odd things" happen. He just organizes blocks and then marvels at what it looks like in a completely boring way.
He spent all his allotted time making the figures, apparently, and took no time to thinking of anything interesting to say about it or describe these "odd things" he teases in the title.
Glad to see this article is up on the front page. I submitted it two days ago and it never got traction.
Question about article submissions - in the past when I've submitted a duplicate article it takes me to that HN posting instead. What are the edge cases where identical articles get posted separately on HN?
We have so much rich geographical data and it's always refreshing to see someone (the artist / architect) asking simple questions about it. I'm much more excited about the work itself than Krulwich's commentary (for as much as I like him). Cities are rich with spatially disjoint points of similarity.
[+] [-] jballanc|13 years ago|reply
That said, this is a case of being right for the wrong reason. Istanbul is an amazing city to walk through. It's like the worlds largest living maze, and you're never quite sure where you'll pop out.
For example, the first time I was there, we turned a corner down an alley to try and get to one of the main roads. The alley started out wide enough for us to walk three-abreast, but quickly narrowed. At some point I looked up and noticed that there was now a roof over our heads. Eventually the alley narrowed to where we had to turn sideways to squeeze past people coming in the opposite direction, and there were shop counters on either side. A few feet more, and we stepped out onto the main street we had been looking for. I turned around, but where I expected to see the alley was, instead, what looked like a regular store-front, identical to all those next to it on either side...
But you don't have to believe me. Yandex has great walking maps of Istanbul! Here's the location I was just describing: http://harita.yandex.com.tr/-/CVeLjW60
[+] [-] robot|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] askar_yu|13 years ago|reply
I still love this city with all its beauty and uniqueness. What I like most is that there are endless amount places to go, see a and discover. But when it comes city-structure, it's the roads that I miss most about US and Kazakhstan where there is a concept of a "sidewalk" and "road" (an actual, real road) - I think you know what I mean by this :)
[+] [-] Jun8|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Retric|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mey|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] cobralibre|13 years ago|reply
See, for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haussmanns_renovation_of_Paris
[+] [-] ggchappell|13 years ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haussmann%27s_renovation_of_Pa...
[+] [-] stevenrace|13 years ago|reply
With the advent of mapping projects (GoogleMaps, Openstreetmap, etc), environmental sensor networks (my startup's area), and cheaper LiDAR arrays (for point cloud mappings of buildings and terrain...now in CMOS form) - we'll be able to quantify the homogeny of surbanization, architectural 'themes', road uniformity, development rates, etc over time.
There are lots of similarly clever projects cited on BLDGBlog [1] if you're into this kind of thing.
[1] http://bldgblog.blogspot.com/
[+] [-] samd|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anonymous|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jrockway|13 years ago|reply
It would be like the suburbs in the US. Houses are all on cul-de-sacs that wind around and eventually join larger streets which eventually join arterial streets. Pretty much like the map of Istanbul they chose.
[+] [-] roc|13 years ago|reply
This lack of connectivity between them is the primary criticism. The map of Istanbul suggests that you might wander into a dead-end alley or cul-de-sac, but one does not enter what amounts to a neighborhood full of dead-ends, the only exit from which is the way you came in. It certainly doesn't suggest that any notable fraction of city is subdivided that way.
[+] [-] davidw|13 years ago|reply
I find US burbs incredibly boring in their sameness, although they do have other advantages.
[+] [-] oh_sigh|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jpdoctor|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] presidentender|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] barrkel|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] nja|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] LesZedCB|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] portlander52232|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mahmud|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Alekanekelo|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] babebridou|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] redcircle|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mey|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ubercore|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] stephth|13 years ago|reply
http://www.armellecaron.fr/art/index.php?page=plans_de_berli...
[+] [-] tripzilch|13 years ago|reply
But it still doesn't mention what sorting key was used to arrange the pieces? Similarity in shape, obviously, but by what measure?
Since it's an art project, it might even have been done semi-manually, by eye?
[+] [-] jules|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] shocks|13 years ago|reply
They're so boring. -__-
[+] [-] freehunter|13 years ago|reply
Country roads in America are anything but boring, though. Some of them are bordering on downright dangerous with the twists, turns, and hills. I've never heard anyone argue that city streets were too efficient.
[+] [-] supreeth|13 years ago|reply
One other interesting exercise would be to map the cities over time. A satellite view image from the 1960's and one from 2012. Could throw up interesting anthropomorphical results.
[+] [-] galvanist|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] MikeCodeAwesome|13 years ago|reply
The above article is part of Big Think's Strange Maps, a fantastic blog which has many, many more interesting articles!
[+] [-] pbhjpbhj|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] trentlott|13 years ago|reply
He spent all his allotted time making the figures, apparently, and took no time to thinking of anything interesting to say about it or describe these "odd things" he teases in the title.
[+] [-] jboggan|13 years ago|reply
Question about article submissions - in the past when I've submitted a duplicate article it takes me to that HN posting instead. What are the edge cases where identical articles get posted separately on HN?
[+] [-] trevin|13 years ago|reply
?sc=tw&cc=share&utm_source=buffer&buffer_share=f34b7
I've seen this issue pop up a few times before on HN.
[+] [-] missechokit|13 years ago|reply
[+] [-] state|13 years ago|reply