(no title)
xenelor | 5 months ago
It is not an installer script (anymore), so instead you have to download a 7GB ISO file (in the name of 'good UX') that ships with Zoom, Spotify, Hey, Basecamp, Steam, Minecraft (??), etc. but you still end up using the same package mirrors (arch's). If it was an install script, like LARBS or many others (before and after omarchy), I'd (almost) get it. If it was a derivative distro, like endeavour or manjaro, I'd (almost) get it. But this just makes no sense. I'm all for making Linux more accessible, but this ain't it, chief.
throwaway106382|5 months ago
It's not just a few libs (anymore), so instead you have to download hundreds of gems (in the game of 'good dev ex') that ships with activsupport, and ORM, ERB and even pushes an app architecture on you but you still end up using ruby. If it was just a few things like sinatra and sequel I'd (almost) get it. If it was a fork of another project like Merb I'd (almost get it) but this just make no sense. I'm all for making web development more accessible but this aint it, chief.
flexagoon|5 months ago
xenelor|5 months ago
berkanunal|5 months ago
> Arch Linux is intentionally minimal, and is meant to be configured by the user during installation so they may add only what they require.
They should have been like DHH, opinonated, convention over configuration and ship with minecraft pre installed
arunc|5 months ago
rtaylorgarlock|5 months ago
OJFord|5 months ago
sbinnee|5 months ago
It is definitely making Linux more accessible. Yet still new comers to Linux will struggle when they want to do sightly more than what Omarchy offers. In that sense, the current Omarchy may not be _accessible_. But I think with this amount of users coming in, they will be able to find ways for almost anything.
It’s been having a great side effect. Hyprland is having a lot of support. I hope that many other pieces will have supports for better Linux experience. Who knows most of major software applications will have official Linux support in a few years.
rtaylorgarlock|5 months ago
sureglymop|5 months ago
I am not in it either, I think arch has great defaults and archinstall is enough. On top of that it's incredibly well documented. But some people just want to hop in as quickly as possible and get to something working.
cal85|5 months ago
Sammi|5 months ago
dmix|5 months ago
xenelor|5 months ago
This is literally from Omarchy's release notes. How is it a problem if I make a comparison but it's ok when DHH does it :) Anyhow, you do you.
IshKebab|5 months ago
If Windows came with all that crap preinstalled we'd call it bloatware.
Very very weird finding choice. There must be hundreds of better strategic investments that could be made. Thousands even.
OJFord|5 months ago
cosmic_cheese|5 months ago
When a distro with a default configuration close to what some group of users is looking for shows up, that's exciting to that group because it's that much less fiddling they need to think about, and perhaps most importantly it's not going to randomly break on them one day because it's represented in the distribution's testing.
dmix|5 months ago
luxcem|5 months ago
sgloutnikov|5 months ago
[0] https://learn.omacom.io/2/the-omarchy-manual/96/manual-insta...
rtaylorgarlock|5 months ago
wiredpancake|5 months ago
[deleted]
skgough|5 months ago
[1] https://regolith-desktop.com/
digdugdirk|5 months ago
aquariusDue|5 months ago
johntash|5 months ago
casey2|5 months ago
If I was conspiratorially minded I would say Omarchy exists and get support just so LARBS users have someone to spit at while feeling like the underdog. Props to the Omarchy creator for being so unabashedly opinionated in their rice despite the years of hate on soy devs. Unused RAM is wasted ram!
TiredOfLife|5 months ago
xenelor|5 months ago
lukaslalinsky|5 months ago
unknown|5 months ago
[deleted]
MantisShrimp90|5 months ago
But other people need an ISO and yes all those things are kinda considered standard at this point.
People like you and I aren't the target audience, but for the people who are, this is what they have been asking for.
k4rnaj1k|5 months ago
onli|5 months ago
Maybe it's more about the willingness to include software other distros see critically and would not include by default, like docker.