top | item 45340046

(no title)

cbradford | 5 months ago

So now we know the reality. An employer, Disney, felt an employee, Kimmel, was damaging their business, let's not forget the point of an employee is to make money for their employer, and as a result took corrective action with the employee. Who was not fired. If a waiter at a restaurant was offending the customers, he would have been fired. Kimmel was treated very kindly and will continue to receive his paycheck. Looks like the wailing about free speech missed the mark

discuss

order

tene80i|5 months ago

You left out the part where a government official all but demanded they do what they did.

cbradford|5 months ago

Must have been a VERY strong demand for Disney to completely ignore it.

defrost|5 months ago

More accurately,

now we have another take on the story, this time the crafted PR spin from Disney retconned for damage control.

cbradford|5 months ago

Disney was probably inundated with demands from other on air talent to reinstate the employee. They then made the calculated judgment that maintaining good employee relations was on balance better served by putting the employee back on the assembly line. This is all usual and standard business. Anyone on here that has ever worked a job has contract that says what they can and cannot do while in the employ of the company.

_DeadFred_|5 months ago

Even if a man is dying of cancer that does not justify the government murdering him.

The Trump appointed FCC head, who is currently evaluating multiple multi-billion dollar requests, said about Kimmel 'we can do this the hard way or we can do this the easy way'.

hackable_sand|5 months ago

Land of the free, home of the brave? Ring a bell?