top | item 45348863

(no title)

ssgodderidge | 5 months ago

Is the goal to make a “universal MCP” that makes it easy to let MCP clients execute thousands of tools on a session by session basis? Or is it more focused on initial tool discovery and registration? If it’s the former, does the process add more latency between user taking action and tool getting executed?

discuss

order

wirehack|5 months ago

Yes it is the former. The value comes from its progressive guidance during a task, not just in the initial setup.

As for latency, we optimized for that. For examples, Strata automatically uses a direct, flat approach for simple cases. And we use less tokens compared to official MCP servers as well, as shown in the benchmark.

typpilol|5 months ago

Isn't Microsoft going to eat your lunch with their "virtual tools" offering for high tool counts?