[genshii]

I'm personally looking forward to this change because I currently pay $20/month just to get edit prediction. I use Claude Code in my terminal for everything else. I do wish I could just pay for edit prediction at an even lower price, but I can understand why that's not an option.

I'm curious if they have plans to improve edit prediction though. It's honestly kind of garbage compared to Cursor, and I don't think I'm being hyperbolic by calling it garbage. Most of the time it's suggestions aren't helpful, but the 10-20% of the time it is helpful is worth the cost of the subscription for me.

[morgankrey]

We have a significant investment underway in edit predictions. We hear you, more soon.

[sippeangelo]

This is the one thing keeping me from switching from Cursor. I much prefer Zed in every other way. Exciting!

[genshii]

That's great to hear, thanks!

[pkilgore]

This is very very exciting.

[dajonker]

The edit prediction model is open source https://huggingface.co/zed-industries/zeta

It's based on qwen 2.5 coder 7B and you should be able to run it locally quite easily since it would only require about 8 GB of VRAM for the 8-bit version. Not sure if Zed supports this though, I'm not a Zed user myself.

[chewz]

I have never used Zed predictions but $20 for 500 prompts is quite a good deal. I use it mostly with Opus for some hard cases.

[typpilol]

10 bucks on copilot and you get unlimited + unlimited gpt4.1 etc

Copilot is the best value by far

[inerte]

That's been my workflow also. Claude Code / OpenAI Codex most of the time, when I have to edit files Cursor's auto-complete is totally worth the $20.