[Master_Odin]

I'm a strong believer that PRs should be merged via a "squash and merge" strategy, with the singular commit being descriptive of the overall change and having a link back to the PR for deeper story analysis as needed. I'm also a staunch believer at this point that PRs should really focus on one thing as well. If when working on a bug you discover another semi-related bug? Open two PRs.

Let main be the story of how code got from point A to B, and PRs be the story of how each incremental step was made.

[g-b-r]

PRs only live on GitHub, what happens if it gets shut down or it accidentally loses some data?

[kiitos]

the entire repo lives only on github as well, there is no meaningful difference between git commits and PR comments in a github-hosted repo