top | item 45374944

(no title)

Covzire | 5 months ago

That's true, although that also took an act of congress so it was very much a bi-partisan effort, something we're sorely lacking today.

discuss

order

terribleperson|5 months ago

The Republican party is literally in control of Congress and the presidency. Copying Clinton is something they could do. The fact that they don't appear to have made a serious effort to increase revenues and reduce spending in a sane and organized way raises questions.

phkahler|5 months ago

The Republicans have this idea that cutting taxes and increasing spending will reduce the ratio of debt/gdp by increasing the denominator. It does increase GDP but I think it increases the debt faster, so it can't work. Happy to be proven wrong.

delusional|5 months ago

> raises questions.

It doesn't "raises questions" it "answers questions". Anybody who believes the republicans in America are "the party of fiscal responsibility" is a joke.

pstuart|5 months ago

> The Republican party is literally in control of Congress and the presidency

And SCOTUS. They have seized power of all three branches and "checks and balances" are but a memory.

zugi|5 months ago

The Senate still requires 60 votes to close debate and pass legislation, with rare weird exceptions like reconciliation. The 1990s had more bipartisanship, so Clinton skillfully got enough Republicans to support some of his moves.

Whereas these days any Democrat supporting any Republican action is likely to get primaried at the next election, and vice versa.

hn_acc1|5 months ago

And whose fault is that? Hint: one party has specifically focused on eliminating ANYTHING resembling bi-partisanship..