[systoll]

If you can start from any arbitrary different point, you can just start from the point you’re intending to reach, and don't need to break any other rules.

As per FIDE rule 3.10.3 "A position is illegal when it cannot have been reached by any series of legal moves". The position isn't legal per FIDE rules.

Beyond there being too many queens… black could not possibly have made the last move. For white to have any moves right now, the last move must have been black moving the king to H8. But G8, G7, H7 are all occupied, so where could the King have moved from?

[zuminator]

Legality is a long standing term of art used by chess problem creators. Essentially it means a position withtwo kings on the board, non touching, and not both in check. And no pawns on first or eighth ranks. It has nothing to do with whether the position is reachable from standard chess rules. Along came FIDE in 1999 with its standardized nomenclature but that doesn't invalidate the terminology used by chess problem creators in their own work.

[systoll]

I don't disbelieve you but… where?

I don't think I’ve ever heard it used like that, and in trying to find any example other than the page we’re commenting on, I’ve only found counterexamples.

Whether it’s wikipedia’s 'Glossary of Chess Problems' or OzProblems or 'Sam Loyd and his chess problems' from 1913, they’re all using 'legal' as synonymous with 'reachable'.