top | item 45387953

(no title)

srge | 5 months ago

Kramnik has proven himself a troll and did a lot of damage to the reputation of honest and otherwise wholesome people and this without credible proof at all. That those allegations persist under the form of news article is very unfortunate to those victims of his smearing.

discuss

order

zahlman|5 months ago

Being a "troll" connotes bad faith, i.e. not believing one's own accusations.

From the footage I've seen of Kramnik, I think he does believe himself, and is just generally very "salty" about losing (as the kids say).

valiant55|5 months ago

I don't believe the strength of ones convictions factors into whether they are a troll or not. Take patent trolls for example.