But the first time it was due to be handled privately and this time by the state. And that was one of the main arguments against it at the time. So I don't think the GP is that far from the truth.
Point being that government can't just mandate and create anything and people will love it. If it was purely private, why did we vote on it. It took a lot of discussion and many iteration and it barley passed in the end.
Which needs to follow a mandate of properly handling user data (Switzerland has a law that's very close to GDPR) and properly respecting privacy as written in the proposal.
Not doing so is something the citizens can sue the government for - as opposed to US "private company can collect whatever, whenever and do whatever" (see credit ratings).
panick21_|5 months ago
Squeeeez|5 months ago
izacus|5 months ago
Not doing so is something the citizens can sue the government for - as opposed to US "private company can collect whatever, whenever and do whatever" (see credit ratings).