(no title)
vikrantrathore | 5 months ago
However, the financial markets, which tend to reward short-term returns and a “winner-takes-all” mindset, have often penalized UPS for this philosophy. In recent years, to satisfy investor demands, UPS management has also turned toward cost-cutting measures. This shift coincided with leadership changes, as the current CEO came from outside the company. External leaders often emphasize sales and marketing over operations, and UPS has followed this trend. As a result, UPS, FedEx, and Amazon are now competing in a cost-reduction race, prioritizing sales growth while reducing operational staff—changes that inevitably affect service quality.
One critical element still missing from the broader logistics landscape is a truly integrated, multi-modal framework that seamlessly combines air, road, rail, and water transport to meet diverse customer needs. While rail may be less applicable in the U.S., it plays a vital role in Europe, China, Japan, and India and could be leveraged more effectively. Perhaps modern logistics theory should evolve to reflect this more holistic, global perspective.
[0] https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/18/ups-drivers-can-earn-as-much...
[1] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ups-drivers-170000-pay-benefits...
nradov|5 months ago
https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-network-development/freight-r...
As for financial markets, your blame is misplaced. This industry is tremendously price sensitive and it seems many customers are willing to accept somewhat worse reliability and service quality in exchange for lower prices. It's similar to passenger airlines in that regard.
nkrisc|5 months ago
Spooky23|5 months ago
Rail is almost always cheaper, and has mostly displaced long haul trucking.
The missing link is water, and the Jones Act, which was specifically intended to destroy intra-US shipping in favor of trucking, has been incredibly successful in doing just that.
FuriouslyAdrift|5 months ago
https://about.ups.com/us/en/newsroom/negotiations/negotiatio...
hhh|5 months ago