top | item 45413229

(no title)

chiffre01 | 5 months ago

Why is it that every single person born between 1940 and 1965 (or making more than $1 million per year) just wants to see all freedoms erased and every natural resource exhausted for their personal comfort?

discuss

order

c-linkage|5 months ago

Because they already own those assets and don't want anyone else to have them. The perception of wealth is always relative so if I can't make any more to maintain my status I must ensure that others can't get what I have.

cjbgkagh|5 months ago

Not sure if the causality there is the right way around, I would suggest that because they have these beliefs they are allowed to amass that wealth. Oracle is a CIA spin-off (1977), they even kept the code name. The CIA works closely with Mossad. The 'abolish all billionaires' plan is encouraged precisely because it will be ineffective - they're assets of the state secret police and good luck abolishing that.

MrDarcy|5 months ago

Mostly agree but your income number is a bit low. Suggest 3-5M per year and 20M net worth.

vid|5 months ago

This is deeply unfair. Plenty of people, including those responsible for more focus on environment and human rights, are in that age group. They are leaders and allies. Ageism is just another way divide society.

cmrdporcupine|5 months ago

Absolutely correct, but also... there is something about having your early growing-up years be in the context of consistent 5-6% annual GDP growth rates and the rollout of interstates/highways, performance automobiles, massive urbanization and the development of giant suburbs with McMansions, two cars in every garage, etc. etc. ... to convince you that you deserve prosperity, that exponential growth, and exploding CO2 emitting energy use is the Natural Order Of Things.

It so happens that in parts of North America this life experience is associated mostly with a certain set of of age/demographics.

chiffre01|5 months ago

You are correct, I put income level in there too. We can't let Peter Thiel or Mark Zuckerberg off the hook either.

Palmik|5 months ago

People making a meager $1 million a year aren't in the same universe as Larry.

For one, he has direct access to (and these days also likely direct influence over) some of the most important members of the legislative and executive branches of the government.