[kketch]

The seems to be looking to let the agent access the source code for review. But in that case, the agent should only see the codebase and nothing else. For a code review agent, all it really needs are:

- Access to files in the repositorie(s)

- Access to the patch/diff being reviewed

- Ability to perform text/semantic search across the codebase

That doesn’t require running the agent inside a container on a system with sensitive data. Exposing an API to the agent that specifically give it access to the above data, avoiding the risk altogether.

If it's really important that the agent is able to use a shell, why not use something like codespaces and run it in there?

[warkdarrior]

It would also need:

- Access to repo history

- Access to CI/CD logs

- Access to bug/issue tracking

[kketch]

I guess maybe even more things? The approach presented in the article doesn't seem like a good way of giving access to these by the way. All of these don't live on a dev machine. Things like Github codespaces are better suited for this job and are in fact already used to implement code reviews by LLMs.

My point is whitelisting is better than blacklisting.

When a front end need access to a bunch of things in a database. We usually provide exactly what's needed through an API, we don't let it run SQL queries on the database and attempt to filter / sandbox the SQL queries.