[bilalq]

I did a double-take when I read that as well. I went and checked the license under rubygems, and sure enough, it's standard MIT with no warranties.

https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/blob/master/LICENSE.txt

[bpt3]

I'm willing to bet the people who published that have no idea what they just said, and probably don't understand what the MIT license contains.

[byroot]

They are talking about the rubygems.org package hosting service...

[charcircuit]

The license is not an accurate way to check if there is a warranty or not.

[spoiler]

I'm not a lawyer, so maybe a silly question: is it possible the software license is different from service warranty? And I guess another thing that comes to mind is that maybe they didn't mean _legal_ warranty, but something that was used colloquially?