top | item 45437545 (no title) ddmma | 5 months ago If disinformation would treated as copyrighted content then world would be better place. discuss order hn newest kingstnap|5 months ago Facts are public domain and can't be copyrighted (you can only argue your creative expression of them, ex in a textbook, is yours).But I suppose that wouldn't apply to disinformation. So your made up bullshit is yours to keep! LeonB|5 months ago Interesting point.It’s a kind of reframing (or consequence of) the bullshit asymmetry principle. ddmma|4 months ago I was referring to the fact that disinformation is helping platforms to make traffic and attract profits, is not seen from a negative impact on society. Copyright content is causing losses therefore is taken seriously in al sort or verifications.
kingstnap|5 months ago Facts are public domain and can't be copyrighted (you can only argue your creative expression of them, ex in a textbook, is yours).But I suppose that wouldn't apply to disinformation. So your made up bullshit is yours to keep! LeonB|5 months ago Interesting point.It’s a kind of reframing (or consequence of) the bullshit asymmetry principle. ddmma|4 months ago I was referring to the fact that disinformation is helping platforms to make traffic and attract profits, is not seen from a negative impact on society. Copyright content is causing losses therefore is taken seriously in al sort or verifications.
LeonB|5 months ago Interesting point.It’s a kind of reframing (or consequence of) the bullshit asymmetry principle.
ddmma|4 months ago I was referring to the fact that disinformation is helping platforms to make traffic and attract profits, is not seen from a negative impact on society. Copyright content is causing losses therefore is taken seriously in al sort or verifications.
kingstnap|5 months ago
But I suppose that wouldn't apply to disinformation. So your made up bullshit is yours to keep!
LeonB|5 months ago
It’s a kind of reframing (or consequence of) the bullshit asymmetry principle.
ddmma|4 months ago