This should be a strike against MS's trustworthiness, if true. A lot of workplaces are hesitant to utilise AI models due to privacy or sensitivity concerns.
FTA: "Government tenants (GCC/DoD) for some reason don't support this capability, the one that Baroudi insists "does not create new data exposure risks."
So the government customers that can really strike back at MS don't get this enabled by default. Very interesting...
I would also wonder if this would trigger IT review due to data access patterns. Having copilot start accessing documents would likely trigger certain security systems at many companies that are designed to prevent corporate espionage. It seems like a good possibility anyway, I certainly wouldn't be willing to risk it just so I could generate AI slop emails.
zrobotics|5 months ago
So the government customers that can really strike back at MS don't get this enabled by default. Very interesting...
I would also wonder if this would trigger IT review due to data access patterns. Having copilot start accessing documents would likely trigger certain security systems at many companies that are designed to prevent corporate espionage. It seems like a good possibility anyway, I certainly wouldn't be willing to risk it just so I could generate AI slop emails.
netsharc|5 months ago
Next they should block me when I try to type the content manually into the Glorified Auto-Correct..
unknown|5 months ago
[deleted]