Cheap, _limitless_ energy from fusion could solve almost every geopolitical/environmental issue we face today. Europe is acutely aware of this at the moment and it's why China and America are investing mega bucks. We will eventually run out of finite energy sources. Even if we do capture the max capacity possible from renewables with 100% efficiency, our energy consumption rates increasing at current rates will eventually exceed this max capacity. Those rates are accelerating. We really have no choice.
Deepmind are working on solving the plasma control issue at the moment, I suspect they're probably using a bit of AI.... and I wouldn't put it past them to crack it.
This is the thing with AI: We can always come up with a new architecture with different inputs & outputs to solve lots of problems that couldn't be solved before.
People equating AI with other single-problem-solving technologies are clearly not seeing the bigger picture.
Time travel was the most important invention of the 1800s too, but that goes to show how bad resolving the temporal paradox issue is, now that entire history is gone.
but people say that AI will spit out that fusion reactor, ergo AI investment is prior in the ordo investimendi or whatever it would be called (by an AI)
Why would it be too cheap to meter? You're still heating up water and putting it through a turbine. We've been doing that for ages (just different sources of energy for the heating up part) and we still meter energy because these things cost money and need lots of maintenance.
As we have more and more solars, we see rises for being connected to the grid more and more while electricity stays relatively cheap. Fusion won't change that, somebody has to pay for the guy reconnecting cables after a storm
jacknews|5 months ago
The maximum possible benefit of fusion (aside from the science gained in the attempt) is cheap energy.
We'll get very cheap energy just by massively rolling out existing solar panels (maybe some at sea), and other renewables, HVDC and batteries/storage.
Fusion is almost certain to be uneconomical in comparison if it's even feasible technically.
AI, is already dramtically impacting some fields, including science (eg deepfold), and AGI would be a step-change.
rimeice|5 months ago
hx8|5 months ago
It might be nice if at the end of the 21st century that is something we care.
gizajob|5 months ago
geerlingguy|5 months ago
unknown|5 months ago
[deleted]
_heimdall|5 months ago
ponector|4 months ago
tim333|5 months ago
Whether it works or not is of course another matter.
Quarrelsome|5 months ago
rimeice|5 months ago
Bigsy|5 months ago
fragmede|5 months ago
> Accelerating fusion science through learned plasma control
https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/accelerating-fusion-sc...
(2022)
robinhoode|5 months ago
People equating AI with other single-problem-solving technologies are clearly not seeing the bigger picture.
BrokenCogs|5 months ago
nemo|5 months ago
seydor|5 months ago
tbrownaw|5 months ago
fundatus|5 months ago
Perz1val|5 months ago
lopis|5 months ago
DengistKhan|4 months ago
mattmaroon|5 months ago
fundatus|5 months ago
NoGravitas|5 months ago
baq|5 months ago
...and it does seem this time that we aren't even in the huge overcapacity part of the bubble yet, and won't be for a year or two.