top | item 45451291

(no title)

abdulhaq | 5 months ago

even if it was true, and the charities say it is not, would that make it OK to starve the people of Gaza?

discuss

order

_DeadFred_|5 months ago

[deleted]

hebelehubele|5 months ago

Distribution points are hours of walking away from the majority of Gazans. Then you have armed forces shooting people seeking food.

From the article: https://imgur.com/a/rqW5m3w

abdulhaq|5 months ago

Ethnic cleansing is deeply wrong, starvation as a tactic of war is horribly wrong, we all know what's happening, please have some respect for peoples' intelligence.

yibg|5 months ago

1. The "war" did not start on Oct 7.

2. Even if a country's government starts a war, that doesn't not justify war crimes. This is why they're called war crimes.

3. Pointing to what allies did 70+ years ago doesn't mean anything.

DiogenesKynikos|5 months ago

The Allied occupying powers tried as hard as they could to get food into Germany. Israel is intentionally blocking food from getting onto Gaza. There's a massive difference.

> War sucks.

That's an awfully glib way of justifying deliberately starving a civilian population. Saying "war sucks" doesn't make it okay to commit war crimes.

quantified|5 months ago

If that's true, they are doing their best to ensure it's not working. Maybe Israel should airlift it over populated areas.