(no title)
glonq | 5 months ago
Damn, Israel is really arguing about how much child starvation they are allowed to inflict before it becomes egregious?
That might be another one of those "are we the baddies?" moments right there.
glonq | 5 months ago
Damn, Israel is really arguing about how much child starvation they are allowed to inflict before it becomes egregious?
That might be another one of those "are we the baddies?" moments right there.
BJones12|5 months ago
basisword|5 months ago
Israel was not arguing about the definition of 'acute malnourished'. The threshold for famine is 15%. The IPC said it had just hit 16% and was thus a famine. Israel was arguing that other data showed it was only 12.2-13.5% and therefore not a famine. When you get to the point of arguing "only 12% of the children are starving, not 16%" you probably shouldn't bother.
falconroar|5 months ago
wat10000|5 months ago
moogly|5 months ago
[deleted]
phgn|5 months ago
Also, the Israeli government cannot be trusted.
Their whole strategy since 1948 has been about distracting the Palestinians with fake peace processes that were never meant to lead to anything.
(see the book "The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine")
Braxton1980|5 months ago
_DeadFred_|5 months ago
[deleted]
potatototoo99|5 months ago
throwup238|5 months ago
If Israel institutes a Marshall Plan equivalent that rebuilds Gaza/West Bank to the NEMA equivalent of West Germany and Japan, then maybe decades from now their actions will receive the same deference that the historical actions of the Allies have now.