[SCHiM]

> Your company can scream to anyone that listens that all the competition is AI SLOP, but when hundreds of companies are pitching the same solution, your one voice will get lost.

If you cannot out compete "AI SLOP" on merit over time (uptime? accuracy? dataloss?), then the AI SLOP is not actually sloppy...

If your runway runs out before you can prove your merit over that timeframe, but you are convinced that the AI is slop, then you should ship the slop first and pivot onec you get $$ but before you get overwhelmed with tech depth.

Personally, I love that I can finally out compete companies with reams of developer teams. Unlike many posters here, I was limited by the time (and mental space) it takes to do the actual writing.

[bee_rider]

It certainly seems possible that AI slop could be flawed in some major ways while still competing well in the market: security is usually invisible to users until it isn’t, similar uptime and bugs, accessibility can be ignored if you don’t mind being an unethical person.

Then again this is also often a flaw with human-generated slop, so it is hard to say what any of this really means.

[HappyPanacea]

> accessibility can be ignored How good are AI-assisted accessibility tools now? Is the poison also the cure here?

[hkon]

I don't think it matters for developers. They compete in the short term.

[pyrale]

I guess the point is that startups are dead because scaling up becomes harder, doesn’t mean that organic growth is harder. In fact, the potential ways forward offered by the article are not really dependent on VC funding.

[dmbche]

What company did you outcompete

[contagiousflow]

But you're not just trying to out compete one AI slop, you must compete with ALL of them. And over time the AI slop to thoughtful company ratio is only going to increase

[Tade0]

Your comment encourages me to make an AI SLOP version of a product I had in mind.