[monadgonad]

> very well understood and documented by a huge community

Is this article not someone in the community documenting what's understood? I'm sorry if it doesn't meet your expectations, but it's fine for me.

[noduerme]

It's an objectively terrible article. It gives a bunch of arbitrary things to copy without really explaining them, and it is completely useless for building anything real. It is probably written by an AI. It's trash. What on earth makes you think it deserves more attention than the other million useless articles on this subject?