(no title)
mkovach | 4 months ago
https://www.tcl-lang.org/community/tcl2017/assets/talk93/Pap...
It's because Tcl, like SQLite, operates on a peculiar metaphysical principle: everything is a string until proven otherwise, and even then, it's probably still a string.
Also, D. Richard Happ, who we owe thanks for SQLite, was and perhaps still sits on the TCL Board (I may be wrong about that, but Happ holds significance in the TCL community).
In my mind:
Tcl is the quietly supportive roommate who keeps making coffee and feeding LISP-like functionality until the world finally notices its genius.
Lua sits across the table, sipping espresso with a faintly amused expression, wondering how everyone got so emotionally entangled with their configuration files.
thadt|4 months ago
Everyone (including me): "oh no, no, you don't want a full Turing complete language in your configuration file format"
Also Everyone: generating their configuration files with every bespoke templating language dreamed of by gods and men, with other Turing complete languages.
mcdonje|4 months ago
justincormack|4 months ago
kragen|4 months ago
7thaccount|4 months ago
mkovach|4 months ago
Performance is up, but so is my inertia. So while TCL 9 could be transformative, for now it remains a white paper I've skimmed, not a revolution I've implemented.
01HNNWZ0MV43FF|4 months ago
I still prefer Lua personally. Their type system is easy for me to understand