top | item 45522989 (no title) phil-martin | 4 months ago The article was fascinating, but the part I didn't see was... what was the motive? Assuming the article paints an accurate picture of what was going on... why was it going on? Is it solely because he runs a company in the same competitive space? discuss order hn newest lemagedurage|4 months ago Yes, he owns a competitor with his wife, formation.dev, so there is a clear incentive. peab|4 months ago Why didn't the author sue? Feels like this is a case where if what he says is true then that's what litigation is for, no? load replies (3) fragmede|4 months ago > And I believe that’s why Michael is doing what he’s doing. He wins when Codesmith loses.Yes. unknown|4 months ago [deleted]
lemagedurage|4 months ago Yes, he owns a competitor with his wife, formation.dev, so there is a clear incentive. peab|4 months ago Why didn't the author sue? Feels like this is a case where if what he says is true then that's what litigation is for, no? load replies (3)
peab|4 months ago Why didn't the author sue? Feels like this is a case where if what he says is true then that's what litigation is for, no? load replies (3)
fragmede|4 months ago > And I believe that’s why Michael is doing what he’s doing. He wins when Codesmith loses.Yes. unknown|4 months ago [deleted]
lemagedurage|4 months ago
peab|4 months ago
fragmede|4 months ago
Yes.
unknown|4 months ago
[deleted]