[fcanesin]

this, Vercel is at ~10B valuation with a business built atop React - they should and will probably take more of Meta space as stewards for it.

[BoorishBears]

Please no. They don't have the best interests of React in mind.

They threw the resources behind RSC to make React, a framework for frontend reactivity, force opt-in for frontend reactivity. Meta is needed more than ever at this point, before React fully becomes a framework for burning compute on Vercel's infra.

[karimf]

I agree with this. I’d prefer to have Meta be the steward for React instead of Vercel because Meta does not have a conflict of interest.

[Rapzid]

Because Vercel makes money when components are rendered server side not client side.

I know almost nobody that even uses server side components. It's right out if your backend isn't node..

[brazukadev]

That is exactly why I stopped using React 2 years ago