[Vipsy]

The new foundation could be a turning point for React, but whether it truly decentralizes decision-making depends on how governance works in practice, not just on the list of corporate sponsors. Open source foundations have helped some projects thrive by formalizing community input, but they can also be slow to adapt if board dynamics favor stability over innovation. The real question is whether small developer voices and radical ideas will shape React's future, or if practical influence stays with the largest sponsors. Compared to one company's oversight, a well-run foundation can make React less vulnerable to a single vendor's agenda—but only if its structures actively foster broad participation and accountability. We'll see if React's evolution speeds up or settles into consensus-driven conservatism.

[SonOfLilit]

Are you implicitly complaining that React is not moving fast enough? What the JS ecosystem needs is for some big players to CHILL a bit and take backwards compat more seriously.

[agos]

when something is moving orthogonally to where you would like it to move, it might as well be not moving for you

[robertoandred]

React has had very few breaking changes.