top | item 45546727

(no title)

Hansappreciator | 4 months ago

[flagged]

discuss

order

andsoitis|4 months ago

> Thiel is clearly out of his depth, unless we're going to pretend he's an informed Bible scholar now. And he's clearly not, since the Antichrist as a figure is an evangelical creation about 150 years old and is not in the Bible at all.

You, my friend, are ill-informed. The idea of the antichrist has deep and complex origins that developed over centuries, blending Jewish apocalyptic expectations, early Christian theology, and later medieval interpretation.

John 2:18 — “Children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that Antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come.”

1 John 4:3 — “This is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already.”

frm88|4 months ago

The concept of an antikhristos is not found in Jewish writings in the period 500 BC–50 AD.[15]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antichrist

It's a later addition, does not refer to one individual only and is said to

... may have been generated by the frustration of Jews subject to often-capricious Seleucid or Roman rule, who found the nebulous Jewish idea of a Satan who is more of an opposing angel of God in the heavenly court insufficiently humanised and personalised to be a satisfactory incarnation of evil and threat same source.

Hansappreciator|4 months ago

This is a pedantic, at best, claim.

If you want scholarly, informed, resources that aren't an ignorant billionaire talking out of his ass, I can provide those. If you aren't interested, kindly stop replying to this thread.

Larrikin|4 months ago

What point are you proving by quoting fiction?