(no title)
oddthink | 4 months ago
I guess you could do double-speed, but I find that somehow stressful.
Edit: I just read the paper. It took me 21 minutes. It's not long, only 11 pages.
oddthink | 4 months ago
I guess you could do double-speed, but I find that somehow stressful.
Edit: I just read the paper. It took me 21 minutes. It's not long, only 11 pages.
brudgers|4 months ago
Finally the are useful for synthesis…a podcast can talk about tenuously related topics that would not usually be appropriate for an academic paper; use analogies, metaphors, and similes; and simply go off topic and discuss other interesting ideas that turn out to be more applicable than the formal subject.
But again that’s for me, not someone else.
nicoburns|4 months ago
distances|4 months ago
dubya|4 months ago
Slight spoiler: they have lots of criticisms of the paper.
tlavoie|4 months ago
Also, show notes link to the paper that they talk about that they do like much better.
kragen|4 months ago
RHSeeger|4 months ago
This format isn't inefficient, you're just judging it based having a different goal than it does.