top | item 45552203

(no title)

vincent-manis | 4 months ago

No, MUMPS (or M) is a remote descendant of JOSS, an interactive language of the 1950s. JOSS has all sorts of variants (DEC's FOCAL language of the 1960s was a dialect), but I think MUMPS is the only living one. MUMPS code is mostly unreadable, as the commands can be, and often are, abbreviated to the first letter. As a result, it looks a lot like line noise.

Regardless of its many warts, Cobol cannot be accused of being unreadable. Verbose, yes.

discuss

order

nradov|4 months ago

MUMPS was originally developed in the 1960s for use on minicomputers that had maybe 64KB RAM. At the time it was a lot more important to keep code size small, hence the single letter commands. Readability wasn't a concern then but it sure looks like a mess today.

vintermann|4 months ago

It's hard to imagine it's an improvement over just the raw assembly.

cyberax|4 months ago

> Regardless of its many warts, Cobol cannot be accused of being unreadable. Verbose, yes.

Hence the "evil twin" comment :)