[cd4plus]

What an incredibly weird take. Higher density cities are better in virtually any environmental metric per capita. This is widely supported

[add-sub-mul-div]

Working backwards from not wanting immigrants to be here paints them into some nonsensical corners.

[hopelite]

You want immigrants that plunder the indigenous population while at the same time enriching the upper class at the expense of the lower classes, but you project your own nonsense on others, thereby proving you are full of it. Why do you support the ruling class using "immigrants" to plunder the non-ruling class? You do not even have the capacity to understand that, but you speak on it anyways.

I benefit immensely financially from "immigrants", but that does not mean it is just and I have the integrity to be honest about that. You clearly do not. Stealing by abstraction and supporting it makes you a bad person, not at all the good person you think you are by supporting "immigration", regardless of whether I get richer today than you make in one year or not because of immigrants.

[mothballed]

Even as measured by pollutants per breath inhaled?

[epistasis]

That would be a health metric, not an environmental one. While brake dust is a major contributor to this, a suburb next to a freeway is going to be pretty damn bad too.