top | item 45588329 (no title) fisian | 4 months ago The reported 119GB vs. 128GB according to spec is because 128GB (1e9 bytes) equals 119GiB (2^30 bytes). discuss order hn newest wmf|4 months ago That can't be right because RAM has always been reported in binary units. Only storage and networking use lame decimal units. simonw|4 months ago Looks like Claude reported it based on this: ● Bash(free -h) ⎿ total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 119Gi 7.5Gi 100Gi 17Mi 12Gi 112Gi Swap: 0B 0B 0B That 119Gi is indeed gibibytes, and 119Gi in GB is 128GB. load replies (2) unknown|4 months ago [deleted] simonw|4 months ago Ugh, that one gets me every time!
wmf|4 months ago That can't be right because RAM has always been reported in binary units. Only storage and networking use lame decimal units. simonw|4 months ago Looks like Claude reported it based on this: ● Bash(free -h) ⎿ total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 119Gi 7.5Gi 100Gi 17Mi 12Gi 112Gi Swap: 0B 0B 0B That 119Gi is indeed gibibytes, and 119Gi in GB is 128GB. load replies (2) unknown|4 months ago [deleted]
simonw|4 months ago Looks like Claude reported it based on this: ● Bash(free -h) ⎿ total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 119Gi 7.5Gi 100Gi 17Mi 12Gi 112Gi Swap: 0B 0B 0B That 119Gi is indeed gibibytes, and 119Gi in GB is 128GB. load replies (2)
wmf|4 months ago
simonw|4 months ago
unknown|4 months ago
[deleted]
simonw|4 months ago