(no title)
DarkmSparks | 4 months ago
Could you clarify if you are saying there was anything other than a lot of logical falicies known as
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Or if the only criticisms of the book are logical falicies.
DarkmSparks | 4 months ago
Could you clarify if you are saying there was anything other than a lot of logical falicies known as
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Or if the only criticisms of the book are logical falicies.
dmbche|4 months ago
Edit0: cant reply further somehow. This isnt a debate and the only supported claims you have done are that you didnt read the book or watch the videos - your claims are moot. I recommend the feeling of grass in the palm of the hand.
DarkmSparks|4 months ago
Not 100% clear if you agree or disagree, but the way this works now, is short of any further criticism that isnt a logical fallacy, is just assume you agree with the book and have no valid criticism of it.
Thanks for the recommendation, think I'll grab a copy and read it for myself. Just about to finish deaths end and was wondering what to read next.