top | item 45615090

(no title)

lisperforlife | 4 months ago

I think you can get much farther with dedicated servers. I run a couple of nodes on Hetzner. The performance you get from a dedicated machine even if it is a 3 year old machine that you can get on server auction is absolutely bonkers and cannot be compared to VMs. The thing is that most of the server hardware is focused towards high core count, low clock speed processors that optimize for I/O rather than compute. It is overprovisioned by all cloud providers. Even the I/O part of the disk is crazy. It uses all sorts of shenanigans to get a drive that sitting on a NAS and emulating a local disk. Most startups do not need the hyper virtualized, NAS based drive. You can go much farther and much more cost-effectively with dedicated server rentals from Hetzner. I would love to know if they are any north-american (particularly canadian) companies that can compete with price and the quality of service like Hetzner. I know of OVH but I would love to know others in the same space.

discuss

order

ozim|4 months ago

As mentioned multiple times in other comments and places people think that doing what Google or FB is doing should be what everyone else is doing.

We are running modest operations on European VPS provider where I work and whenever we get a new hire (business or technical does not matter) it is like a Groundhog day - I have to explain — WE ALREADY ARE IN THE CLOUD, NO YOU WILL NOT START "MIGRATING TO CLOUD PROJECT" ON MY WATCH SO YOU CAN PAD YOUR CV AND MOVE TO ANOTHER COMPANY TO RUIN THEIR INFRA — or something along those lines but asking chatgpt to make it more friendly tone.

PeterStuer|4 months ago

The number of times I have seen fresh "architects" come in with an architectural proposal for a 10 user internal LoB app that they got from a Meta or Microsoft worldscale B2C service blueprint ...

kccqzy|4 months ago

> doing what Google or FB is doing

Google doesn't even deploy most of its own code to run on VMs. Containers yes but not VMs.

jwr|4 months ago

I actually benchmarked this and wrote an article several years back, still very much applicable: https://jan.rychter.com/enblog/cloud-server-cpu-performance-...

kees99|4 months ago

Did you "preheat" during those tests? It is very common for cloud instances to have "burstable" vCPUs. That is - after boot (or long idle), you get decent performance for first few minutes, then performance gradually tanks to a mere fraction of the initial burst.

eahm|4 months ago

I recently rediscovered this website that might help: https://vpspricetracker.com

Too cool to not share, most of the providers listed there have dedicated servers too.

CaptainOfCoit|4 months ago

Great website, but what a blunder to display the results as "cards" rather than a good old table so you can scan the results rather than having to actually read it. Makes it really hard to quickly find what you're looking for...

Edit: Ironically, that website doesn't have Hetzner in their index.

chromehearts|4 months ago

Amazing website, glad to know that I already have a super great offer! But will definitely share this

aantix|4 months ago

What a great site. Thanks for sharing!

63stack|4 months ago

This is an amazing site

ta12653421|4 months ago

++1

excellent website, thanks.

codethief|4 months ago

> I would love to know if they are any north-american (particularly canadian) companies that can compete with price and the quality of service like Hetzner

FWIW, Hetzner has two data centers in the US, in case you're just looking for "Hetzner quality but in the US", not for "American/Canadian companies similar to Hetzner".

CaptainOfCoit|4 months ago

IIRC, Hetzners dedicated instances are only available in their German and Finnish data centers, not anywhere else sadly :/

g8oz|4 months ago

Similarly OVH is French and has bare metal in their US and Canadian data centers.

matt-p|4 months ago

Yeah no dedicated severs in the US sadly. I'm not aware of anyone who can quite match hetzners pricing in the US (but if someone does I'd love to know!). https://www.serversearcher.com throws up clouvider and latitiude at good pricing but.. not hetzner levels by any means.

shlomo_z|4 months ago

I have been considering colocating at endoffice (I saw the suggestion once at codinghorror.com)

ta1243|4 months ago

For self hosted / cohosting my own kit, I buy refurbed servers from https://www.etb-tech.com/ because I can spec exactly what I want and see how the cost varies, what the delivery time is, etc.

Years ago Broadberry has a similar thing with Supermicro, but not any more. You have to talk to a sales person about how they can rip you off. Then they don't give you what you specced anyway -- I spec 8x8G sticks of ram, they provide 2x32G etc.

bakugo|4 months ago

Be warned though that, when renting dedicated servers, there are certain issues you might have to deal with that usually aren't a factor when renting a VPS.

For example, I got a dedicated server from Hetzner earlier this year with a consumer Ryzen CPU that had unstable SIMD (ZFS checksums would randomly fail, and mprime also reported errors). Opened a ticket about it and they basically told me it wasn't an issue because their diagnostics couldn't detect it.

CaptainOfCoit|4 months ago

Yeah, their support, for better or worse, is really technical and you need to send all the evidence of any faults to convince them. But when I've had random issues happening, I've sent them all the troubleshooting and evidence I came across, and a couple of hours later they had provisioned a new host for me with the same specs.

And based on our different experiences, the quality of care you receive could differ too :)

wongarsu|4 months ago

> I would love to know if they are any north-american (particularly canadian) companies that can compete with price and the quality of service like Hetzner.

In a thread two days ago https://ioflood.com/ was recommended as US-based alternative

amelius|4 months ago

But I'm looking more for "compute flood" ...

deaux|4 months ago

On a similar note, I'm looking for a "Hetzner, but in APAC, particularly East Asia". I've struggled to find good options for any of JP, TW or KR.

b0ner_t0ner|4 months ago

LayerStack is very fast in APAC:

    https://www.layerstack.com/en/dedicated-cloud

citrin_ru|4 months ago

VMs are middle ground between AWS and dedicated hardware. With hardware you need to monitor it, report problems/failures to the provider, make necessary configuration changes (add/remove node to/from a cluster e. t. c.). If a team is coming from AWS it may have no experience with monitoring/troubleshooting problems caused by imperfect hardware.

mrinterweb|4 months ago

One thing that frustrates me with estimating performance on AWS is that I have to dramatically estimate down from the performance of my dev laptop (M2 MBP). I've noticed performance tradeoffs around 15x slower when deployed to AWS. I realize that's a anecdotal number, but this is a fairly consistent trend I've seen at different companies running on cloud hosting services. One of the biggest performance hits is latency between servers. If you're server is making hundreds or thousands of db queries per second, you're going to feel that pain on the cloud more even if your cloud db server CPU is relatively bored. It is network latency. I look at the costs of AWS and it is easy to spend >$100,000 month.

I have ran services on bare metal, and VPSs, and I always got far better performance than I can get from AWS or GCP for a small fraction of the cost. To me "cloud" means vendor lock-in, terrible performance, and wild costs.

benjiro|4 months ago

> It is network latency.

People do not realize for that fancy infinite storage scaling, that it means that AWS etc run network based storage. And that, like on a DB, can be a 10x performance hit.

micw|4 months ago

I have seen hetzners cloud block storage to be quite slow. It became soon a bottleneck on our timescale databases. Now we're testing on netcup.com's "root servers" which are VPS with dedicated CPU cores and lots of very fast storage.

nik736|4 months ago

They limit them to 7500 IOPS, as stated in their docs. It also doesn't scale with size, the limit is there for every volume of any size.

matt-p|4 months ago

Quite a few options on https://serversearcher.com that sell in US/CA.

Clouvider is available in alot of US DCs, 4GB ram/2cpu/80GB NVME and a 10Gb port for like $6 a month.

lossolo|4 months ago

I've been using dedicated servers for 20 years. Here's my top list:

Hetzner, OVH, Leaseweb, and Scaleway (EU locations only).

I've used other providers as well, but I won't mention them because they were either too small or had issues.

CaptainOfCoit|4 months ago

> . I know of OVH but I would love to know others in the same space.

When I've needed dedicated servers in the US I've used Vultr in the past, relatively nice pricing, only missing unmetered bandwidth for it to be my go-to. But all those US-specific cases been others paying for it, so hasn't bothered me, compared to personal/community stuff I host at Hetzner and pay for myself.

rapind|4 months ago

I've been eying Vultr for dedicated metal in Canada (Toronto Datacenter). How do they measure up to Hertzner? I'm not looking to get the best possible deal, but just better value than EC2 (which costs me a fair amount of egress).

shrubble|4 months ago

I have used wholesaleinternet.net and they are centrally located in the USA.

yread|4 months ago

ugh 235$ a month for a 4TB SSD?! You can buy one for that price and have some money left over

zakki|4 months ago

Try www.wowrack.com or www.serverstadium.com. (I work for them).

torginus|4 months ago

Virtualization has a crazy overhead - when we moved to metal instances in AWS, we gained like 20-25% performance. I thought that since AWS has the smartest folks in the business and Intel & co. has been at this for decades, it'd be like a couple percent overhead at most, but no.

hshdhdhehd|4 months ago

It can affect system design. Just chuck it all on one box! And it will be crazy fast.

michalsustr|4 months ago

Interserver. But I don’t have personal experience (yet)

yread|4 months ago

I used GTHost in the US. Performance is not bad but you do end up paying more if you need 1gbit/s link.

tonyhart7|4 months ago

Yeah this is what they do in "high perfomance" server, they just use gaming cpu