top | item 45617769

(no title)

cyrnel | 4 months ago

The response to that: https://andre.arko.net/2025/10/09/the-rubygems-security-inci...

discuss

order

ameliaquining|4 months ago

This is about a different part of the controversy, and doesn't respond to the allegation of a monetization proposal.

tehryanx|4 months ago

Yes it does. He's refuting that in this part of the post:

> When they finally did reply, they seem to have developed some sort of theory that I was interested in “access to PII”, which is entirely false. I have no interest in any PII, commercially or otherwise. As my private email published by Ruby Central demonstrates, my entire proposal was based solely on company-level information, with no information about individuals included in any way. Here’s their response, over three days later.