[patagurbon]

> whatever the mechanism

Is straining to carry the rest of this sentence. I responded to an assertion that a policy by certain limited universities was attempted and deemed unfit by the natural process was still active. This is how institutions grow and evolve.

> echo chambers

Publish your papers, rebut the research. This is actively happening every day in every field of science. It is happening in everything from gender studies to particle physics.

> poison the public discourse

What on Earth are you talking about. What public discourse are you frequenting which is driven primarily by this boogeyman of the university system rather than the attention driven rat race of national fear politics.

[patagurbon]

Who, what? Elaborate. Waving your hands like this is meaningless.

What are these progressive views? What is this scientific evidence? Who are these people trying rigorously?

[grumio]

Who are these people that are being cancelled, that have "scientific evidence" to contradict the "Progressive views"?

What topics?

[hypeatei]

> You can't on the topics they're talking about

What topics? I have a hard time taking comments like this seriously as it reads like you have a persecution complex while your guy just got elected and he controls all three branches of government. Surely if conservatives actually cared about solving this existential problem, they'd gather input from everyone and write legislation for it? No?