[syntax-sherlock]

Good questions!

1) Beyond basic tests: You're right to be skeptical. This is best for quick exploratory testing during local development ("does my new feature work?"), not replacing your test suite. Think "scriptable manual testing" - faster than writing Playwright manually, but not suitable for comprehensive CI/CD test coverage.

2) Data privacy: Screenshots stay local in /tmp, but console output and page content Claude writes tests against are sent to Anthropic. This is a local dev tool for testing with dummy data, not for production environments with real user data. Same privacy model as any AI coding assistant - if you wouldn't show Claude your production database, don't test against it with this.

[Rooster61]

Thanks. I keep seeing silver bullet testing solutions pitched left right and center and wondering about these two points. Glad to see a project with realistic boundaries and expectations set. Would definitely give this a shot if I was working on a local project.

[blks]

Another llm-generated response. This is sad.