(no title)
krst252009 | 4 months ago
At the same time, I wonder if there’s a balance. Curating context might be necessary for mental clarity, especially when the volume of global news is overwhelming. Maybe the goal isn’t to consume everything, but to design systems (or habits) that surface the most structurally important signals — the kind that shape long-term outcomes.
I’ve been working on tools that simplify decision-making in finance, and this idea of “context compression” really resonates. Curious how others manage the tension between staying informed and staying sane.
ivape|4 months ago
Right, the “filter”. Again, the simplest thing people do is put up their mental firewall and don’t manage the whitelist. That means things don’t even get through to be classified as important.
The other variant of that is there is no filter at all, but the person lacks the ability to classify anything as important (classified incorrectly).
If we filter correctly, and classify correctly, that’s probably best. The filter part is easy, just do it. The classification part requires, in my opinion, some kind of value system.
krst252009|4 months ago
In finance, I’ve seen this play out when people chase trends without anchoring decisions to personal goals or values. That’s why I’ve been exploring ways to build tools that help users define their own “signal criteria” — not just what gets through, but why it’s worth acting on.
Would love to hear how others have built or discovered systems that help with this kind of value-driven classification — whether in news, tech, or life.