I'm going to paraphrase Matt Levine here -- the central trick of bankers is to divide debt into tranches of claims of different seniority, with different rates of return. Debt is a way to borrow money from investors where they actually have a generally low rate of return specified and have a senior claim on being paid back in the case of insolvency. Stocks are a way to borrow money for investors where they get basically _nothing_ in the case of insolvency, but they expect a higher return from either dividends or stock buy backs, or just from company growth. Different investors have different goals in terms of risk/reward for what they want out of a company they invest in, and providing investors more options unlocks more opportunities to raise money.
Convertible debt is very different: if you do the same (simplistic) analysis as in the article, it behaves almost like the equity example, not the debt one.
As a shareholder, thanks for going the convertible debt route! I like the fact that the company became profitable but the call option component of the previous round of "senior convertible notes" expired out of the money.
Comparatively speaking, I don't know why investors won't touch DOCN with a 10-foot pole, but I will gleefully reap my returns from dividends and stock buybacks when DOCN laps AWS in 20 years with better services maintained by better engineering staff.
It stems from the relatively low capital requirements of tech companies relative to other industries (pre-LLM). Now that this factor has changed we see them rapidly adopting debt financing for their capital intensive LLM projects.
empath75|4 months ago
frankchn|4 months ago
dmurray|4 months ago
neom|4 months ago
president_zippy|4 months ago
Comparatively speaking, I don't know why investors won't touch DOCN with a 10-foot pole, but I will gleefully reap my returns from dividends and stock buybacks when DOCN laps AWS in 20 years with better services maintained by better engineering staff.
nl|4 months ago
This Forbes article has a good overview: https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyfeldman/2023/03/19/silicon-v...
JumpCrisscross|4 months ago
Debt is almost always cheaper than equity. Particularly if you can collateralise.
Well-capitalized companies rejecting debt is more of a Silicon Valley outlier in the global economy. (It likely stems from dot-com trauma.)
terminalshort|4 months ago
mamonster|4 months ago
IMO it's because CFO is treated as a second-tier C-suite role in Silicon Valley and a lot of the CFOs are completely substandard as a result.
A lot of CEO have the mentality that if the product and the tech works the money sorts itself out, so your CFO is already behind the CTO and the CPO.
Closi|4 months ago
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/amazon-pays-off-its-hi...
shmatt|4 months ago
reaperducer|4 months ago
I think we're well beyond the point where OpenAI can be called a "startup."
epolanski|4 months ago
Different dictionaries provide different definitions.
A common one is that it's small and recently started business, but it's a very vague boundary.
unknown|4 months ago
[deleted]