top | item 4569394 (no title) luriel | 13 years ago Go does incremental compilation just fine.Nobody has bothered to add parallel compilation because building Go code is already so ridiculously fast. discuss order hn newest slurgfest|13 years ago Fast is relative to purpose. Maybe could afford to be faster in the context of an IDE checking your code on the fly, for a large project. I wouldn't know, since I have not attempted to write it. rogpeppe1|13 years ago actually, the Go tool compiles packages in parallel by default. microtonal|13 years ago ...under the assumption that something does not depend on too many cgo packages. Locke1689|13 years ago Source? That's not what the article says. cmccabe|13 years ago The 8g, 6g, etc compilers operate on a single .go file at a time. You're welcome to invoke them directly if you want.
slurgfest|13 years ago Fast is relative to purpose. Maybe could afford to be faster in the context of an IDE checking your code on the fly, for a large project. I wouldn't know, since I have not attempted to write it.
microtonal|13 years ago ...under the assumption that something does not depend on too many cgo packages.
Locke1689|13 years ago Source? That's not what the article says. cmccabe|13 years ago The 8g, 6g, etc compilers operate on a single .go file at a time. You're welcome to invoke them directly if you want.
cmccabe|13 years ago The 8g, 6g, etc compilers operate on a single .go file at a time. You're welcome to invoke them directly if you want.
slurgfest|13 years ago
rogpeppe1|13 years ago
microtonal|13 years ago
Locke1689|13 years ago
cmccabe|13 years ago